![]() ![]() Embrace all technology and be willing to engage in what others may deem less worthy. With that I would still say, do your due diligence and research and always get a second opinion. With the experience, background as well as familiarity with Apple Mac and cross platform support as I have been blessed with. As there are many familiar with all things MicroSoft & Windows related. I would question ones experience in regards to all things Apple Mac. Although some may disagree with my view or opinion. ![]() InTune is not nearly as easy to use in my view. ![]() Has been providing MDM solutions for years while Intune may be owned by big money and an even bigger name in MicroSoft. ![]() JAMF is far superior if your talking about managing APPLE MAC machines and devices only. In my view there is no comparing the two. I still like the environment or the way they're doing it, but I'm just trying to think of things that would help people. You also wouldn't take as much time off from work because it could be done in two or three days versus four days. That would be a little easier for people to manage if they had to do it on their own or for an employer to commit to putting somebody in a class. If they break it up in half, it would be a thousand dollars or a little bit less. They can either make it a little less expensive or break it up into smaller modules so that people could go along, and it'll be easier for them to afford. It makes it harder for some people to get their necessary training. I know that not everyone pays for it on their own, and they try to get it from their employer, but it's a big investment even for employers. When they're between $2,000 to $2,500 for each course, depending on if you are an educational institute or not, it's hard for somebody if they're paying it out of their own pocket. It would be great if the training was a little less expensive, or they could break it up into less expensive modules so that it's easier for people to get through. They can make some of the extension attributes the actual attributes. The only potential solution I've heard is Jamf Cloud Premium to restrict access to Jamf Pro to specific IP addresses but an additional $20k/year on top of the existing Jamf Cloud cost seems excessive.We would like to have some of the extension attributes configured so that those extension attributes can be part of the core structure. Am I correct in understanding that for every customer of Jamf Cloud, there exists a username and password which, if it became compromised, could be used to issue wipe commands to every Mac in the org (and given the potential fallout of data leaks, that'd be a best-case scenario?) That just seems like an overwhelming risk given I can't even sign into Slack without using MFA but a system with all the power of Jamf will happily let someone in with just a straight username/password? Sure, you can set up SSO but just adding /?failover to the end of the URL bypasses that. There's one item that just has me completely baffled though - Jamf Cloud allows anyone anywhere in the world to sign into your Jamf Pro instance with only a username/password. We've been using on-prem for years and have occasionally been taking a look at moving to Jamf Cloud hosting for Jamf Pro. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |